In a move that would have surprised few on the Rock, it was reported that a football team playing in Gibraltar’s first division would remunerate its players with cryptocurrency. Gibraltar United, which made headlines last year following the major investment by former Real Madrid right-back Michel Salgado.
Over the course of 2018 Gibraltar has seen a substantial increase in the use of cryptocurrency and the emergence of start-up ventures in the blockchain space.
But with this being the first integration of two of the most popular topics in Gibraltar (crypto and football), here’s a few things players (or anyone accepting payment in crypto) should consider.
A cryptocurrency’s volatility is arguably its most talked about feature. Exciting jumps have equally met dramatic drops.
If the player is being paid a fixed amount in sterling and has simply elected to accept payment of that fixed amount by way of cryptocurrency, then that cryptocurrency’s volatility should not affect the payment – the players remuneration (in cryptocurrency) will either be higher or lower depending on its value against sterling (using this example). If this is the case (indeed in any case), the player’s contract should expressly state what the exact amount of consideration is (including any successes bonus or other fees) being paid. If that amount can then be paid in a different currency (e.g. a cryptocurrency), the contract should also expressly say that this may be done and that such a payment in a different currency to that in the contract would be paid on an equivalent basis and calculated at the rate of the date on which the payment is being made.
Moreover, where it is commercially acceptable to the club, the player may also wish to have the club guarantee the payment (in the fiat equivalent) should the cryptocurrency of choice ultimately fail beyond any possibility of picking itself up again.
The above scenario is based on the assumption that it is commercially agreed between the player and the club that the player will be paid the fixed amount and such amount will be paid in crypto. On the other hand, where the player and the club might have commercially agreed that the player’s remuneration will be in crypto (players may well see this as an opportunity to play the crypto-market) – irrespective of the value of that crypto-coin, then players must be made aware that there is no guarantee that a cryptocurrency’s price will rise and there may be no intrinsic value in it.
A cryptocurrency’s volatility could potentially be equally as risky for the club as it is for the player. In order for a club to be able to pay its players in crypto – it needs to own that crypto in the first place. Given that the crypto’s value could go up or down at any minute, the club’s investment in that crypto-coin is itself a risk for the club. Will the value the club has put into that crypto-coin still have the same value the following week or by the end of the season? The guidance notes to the much talked about DLT Regulations[2] suggests that DLT providers should maintain enough reserves in fiat to meet all of its crypto-liabilities. Although football clubs would, in most cases, fall within the DLT Regulations any clubs looking to pay its players in crypto should consider adopt that guidance.
To very quickly conclude, we’ll highlight a few more general issues to consider when when a player enters into any form of contract.
[1] Over the course of 2018 Gibraltar has seen a substantial increase in the use of cryptocurrency and the emergence of start-up ventures in the blockchain space. Football has also seen a particular increase in investment since the Gibraltar Football Association admission to UEFA in 2013 and FIFA in 2016.
[2] Financial Services (Distributed Ledger Technology Providers) Regulations 2017
Disclaimer:
This document has been issued on the 20th Aug 2018 by Triay Lawyers Limited, trading as Triay Lawyers, a Gibraltar private company limited by shares with registered office at 28 Irish Town, Gibraltar, GX11 1AA and with incorporation number 112599. The information in this document is for general information purposes only and does not constitute professional advice, legal or otherwise and does not intend to be comprehensive. Triay Lawyers does not accept responsibility for any loss that may arise from accessing or relying upon the information contained in this document.
On Monday 16th May 2022, the Honourable Steven Linares MP provided an succinct update in Parliament on the construction of the Co-Ownership Housing Estates.
Director Jay Gomez has been appointed to participate on a working policy group by Minister Albert Isola Minister for Digital and Financial Services, the working group has been asked to advise